Zoziya Kardava vs Aglaya Fedorova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Kardava and Fedorova have shown varying effectiveness on second serves. In the past six months, Kardava has secured 34.39% of points on second serves, while Fedorova achieved a slightly better figure of 36.96%. This stat is significant for predicting outcomes.
• When considering return games, Kardava excels by winning 60% of opponents' second serve points, compared to Fedorova’s 48.98%. Also, Kardava leads in first serve returns with a 41.04% success rate versus 36.99% for Fedorova. How might this affect the match's outcome? Historical data suggests Kardava is somewhat favored.
• Analyzing play under pressure, Kardava has warded off 45.25% of breakpoints, whereas Fedorova has a superior breakpoint save rate of 51.35%. This could be critical during tense moments of the game.
• Each player's recent match win rates are comparable; Kardava has won 59.57% of matches this past year, while Fedorova edged slightly ahead with 60.87% wins. Does this indicate a close match? It could likely be.
• Surface preferences can be pivotal. Kardava performs best on indoor hard courts, whereas Fedorova favors hard courts, winning 54% of her matches there.
• Both players often compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments. Kardava has a marginally higher win rate (62.5%) compared to Fedorova’s 61.54% in the same level tournaments.
• Looking at opponent quality, Kardava faces slightly tougher competitors, with her opponents having an average rank of 375.47 relative to Fedorova’s 418.35.
• In matches stretching to deciding sets, Fedorova has a stronger track record, winning 67% versus Kardava’s 53%. Could this be the deciding factor if the match goes the distance?
• In terms of breaking serves, Kardava converts 42.25% of break opportunities, outmatching Fedorova’s 35.71%, offering a critical edge during pivotal points.

Editorial Prediction (August 13, 2025, UTC):

Kardava's strength in return games and breaking points presents a significant advantage. Her ability to capitalize on opponent weaknesses, especially on second serves, might give her the upper hand.

Fedorova, however, has shown resilience in set deciders and under pressure, qualities that could prove crucial if the match becomes tight. Her slightly superior second-serve performance might also disrupt Kardava’s rhythm.

The match is anticipated to be closely contested, with both athletes exhibiting strengths that could tilt the outcome. However, based on recent form and specific advantages in returning games, Kardava is slightly favored to emerge victorious in this encounter.